Scores/Lombard Finance

Lombard Finance

TEMPERED

BTC Staking · Ethereum · $500M+ TVL · 10 contracts

Official site: lombard.finance ↗

680

3004756508251000

Confidence53%

Z-Factor0.50

Updated 2026-05-27Public score

Security Profile

Access Control
62

Economic Soundness
60

Oracle Integrity
65

Compositional Risk
58

Governance
42

Maturity
30

Resilience
50

Supply Chain
65

Op Security
56

Cascade Exposure
100

Access Ctrl
62

Economic
60

Oracle
65

Compos.
58

Govern.
42

Maturity
30

Resilience
50

Supply Ch.
65

OpSec
56

Cascade
100

Min

Avg

Max

100

Audit History

Halborn

2024-07

Code4rena

2024-09

Bug Bounty Program

$250,000

Max payout on Immunefi

View Program

Assessment

Very new BTC liquid staking protocol (6 months). D6 extremely low (30) for minimal maturity. D5 low (42) for consortium-controlled governance. Novel BTC staking model via Babylon with unproven economics. Low confidence across all dimensions.

Dimension Breakdown

Methodology

Access Control

Weight 18% · 58% confidence

+21Security consortium manages BTC custody

+21Threshold signature scheme for BTC operations

-38Centralized minting authority for LBTC

+21Limited user control over custody process

Provenance

Economic Soundness

Weight 13% · 55% confidence

+20BTC liquid staking via Babylon protocol

+20LBTC peg dependent on BTC custody integrity

-40Nascent economic model, untested under stress

+20Dependency on Babylon staking economics

Provenance

Oracle Integrity

Weight 13% · 58% confidence

+16BTC/ETH cross-chain state attestation

+16Consortium-based validation of BTC deposits

+16Limited on-chain oracle infrastructure

+16Trust assumption in security consortium

Provenance

Battle-Tested Maturity

Weight 12% · 45% confidence

+10Live since late 2024 (~6 months)

-70Very new protocol with minimal production history

+10Rapid TVL growth but no stress-test events

+10Z-factor: 0.5

Provenance

Governance & Upgradeability

Weight 10% · 55% confidence

+42Security consortium controls protocol

-19No token governance at launch

-19Centralized decision-making

-19Upgrade authority held by small group

Provenance

Adversarial Resilienceredacted

Weight 10% · 30% confidence

No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline

Provenance

Operational Security

Weight 10% · 60% confidence

-15No branch protection detected

-15CI/CD present but unstable (0% success)

+19Commit signing: 100% verified

-15Weak PR review coverage (0%)

Provenance

Compositional Risk

Weight 5% · 55% confidence

+14LBTC integrates across multiple DeFi protocols

+14Cross-chain BTC custody adds composition layers

+14Babylon dependency for staking yield

+14Novel primitive with untested integration patterns

Provenance

Cascade Exposure

Weight 5% · 50% confidence

100

+33Member of 2 dependency cluster(s)

+33No cross-protocol cascade exposure detected

+33Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis

Provenance

Supply Chain

Weight 4% · 58% confidence

+16Solidity contracts for EVM side

+16Bitcoin script for BTC custody

+16Cross-chain dependency on Babylon

+16Mixed technology stack

Provenance

Top Score Drivers

Dimensions with the greatest marginal impact on BRI.

Battle-Tested Maturity

30+59 potential

Very new protocol with minimal production history

Governance & Upgradeability

42+34.4 potential

Security consortium controls protocol

Access Control

62+34.1 potential

Centralized minting authority for LBTC

Adversarial Resilience

50+27.3 potential

Economic Soundness

60+26.1 potential

Nascent economic model, untested under stress

Adversarial Risk Signals

Publicly verifiable security posture indicators.

Disclosure HistoryNot Assessed

Remediation VelocityNot Assessed

Bug Bounty ProgramNot Assessed

Audit CoverageNot Assessed

Incident HistoryNot Assessed

Deployed 2024-08-0110 dimensionsProvenance Ledger

methodology v2.1formula v1.1weights v1.1evidence sha256:sha256:5...

Score History & Verification

Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.

Full provenance ledger

On-Chain Data

Protocol Slug: "lombard"
Oracle: BRORegistry (Base)
Evidence: IPFS (pinned)
Staleness Threshold: 24 hours

Read Score

registry.getScore("lombard")

Reduce exploitable risk

Continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, and verified reassessment.

View Plans Methodology

Embed this score

Live, updates automatically. Free for any site. Click-through links open the full report on BlackHart.

Public

Style

Theme

Format

Preview

Copy iframe code

<iframe
  src="https://blackhart.io/embed/oracle/lombard?variant=card&theme=dark"
  title="BlackHart Risk Index: Lombard Finance"
  width="340"
  height="290"
  frameborder="0"
  loading="lazy"
  style="border:0; max-width:100%;"
></iframe>

Believe this score contains a factual error? Submit evidence for review