Scores/Liquity BOLD

Liquity BOLD

DAMASCUS

Stablecoin · Ethereum · $500M+ TVL · 15 contracts

Official site: www.liquity.org ↗

778

3004756508251000

Confidence60%

Z-Factor0.62

Updated 2026-05-27Public score

Security Profile

Access Control
82

Economic Soundness
72

Oracle Integrity
78

Compositional Risk
65

Governance
90

Maturity
42

Resilience
50

Supply Chain
85

Op Security
56

Cascade Exposure
100

Access Ctrl
82

Economic
72

Oracle
78

Compos.
65

Govern.
90

Maturity
42

Resilience
50

Supply Ch.
85

OpSec
56

Cascade
100

Min

Avg

Max

100

Audit History

Dedaub

2024-06

Cantina Competition

2024-08

ChainSecurity

2024-09

Bug Bounty Program

$125,000

Max payout on Cantina

View Program

Assessment

Governance-minimized stablecoin from proven Liquity team. Immutability gives top scores in D1/D5/D8/D11 but very low maturity (Z=0.374, D6=42) is the critical drag. Novel interest rate mechanism untested. Score will rise rapidly if no exploit in first 18 months.

Dimension Breakdown

Methodology

Access Control

Weight 18% · 70% confidence

+20Immutable contracts (no admin keys, no upgradability)

+20Permissionless borrowing and liquidation

+20No governance control over protocol parameters

+20User-set interest rates (novel mechanism)

Provenance

Economic Soundness

Weight 13% · 65% confidence

+18BOLD stablecoin with user-set interest rates (novel)

+18Multi-collateral (ETH, wstETH, rETH) with independent markets

+18Interest rate mechanism untested at scale

+18Redemption mechanism redesigned from Liquity V1

Provenance

Oracle Integrity

Weight 13% · 72% confidence

+20Chainlink oracles with fallback to Uniswap TWAP

+20Dual oracle design provides redundancy

+20LST exchange rate handling adds complexity

+20Oracle failure modes well-considered in design

Provenance

Battle-Tested Maturity

Weight 12% · 60% confidence

+14Mainnet since October 2025 (~7 months)

-29Very new protocol, limited battle testing

+14V1 (LUSD) ran 4+ years without exploit (team has track record)

+14Multiple audits (Dedaub, ChainSecurity, Certora formal verification)

Provenance

Governance & Upgradeability

Weight 10% · 85% confidence

+22Fully immutable, no governance attack surface

+22No admin keys, no multisig risk

+22Parameter changes impossible (governance-minimized by design)

+22Highest possible governance score for DeFi

Provenance

Adversarial Resilienceredacted

Weight 10% · 30% confidence

No validated adversarial findings — score set to neutral baseline

Provenance

Operational Security

Weight 10% · 60% confidence

-22No branch protection detected

-22CI/CD present but unstable (0% success)

+28Low development activity (8 commits/month)

+28Multiple monitoring repos found: liqbot, mev-job-board, cr-monitor

Provenance

Compositional Risk

Weight 5% · 68% confidence

+16LST collateral inherits staking protocol risk (Lido, RocketPool)

+16BOLD composed in DeFi lending and DEXes

+16Cross-collateral type risks bounded by independent markets

+16Stability pool composition is well-scoped

Provenance

Cascade Exposure

Weight 5% · 55% confidence

100

+33Appears in 1 cross-protocol cascade chain(s)

+33Member of 2 dependency cluster(s)

+33Source: cross_protocol_composition.json dependency analysis

Provenance

Supply Chain

Weight 4% · 80% confidence

-15Clean Solidity with no upgradeable patterns

+42Standard OpenZeppelin for token interfaces

+42Immutability means no supply chain update risk post-deploy

Provenance

Top Score Drivers

Dimensions with the greatest marginal impact on BRI.

Battle-Tested Maturity

42+52.5 potential

Very new protocol, limited battle testing

Adversarial Resilience

50+34.3 potential

Operational Security

56+28.6 potential

Low development activity (8 commits/month)

Economic Soundness

72+20.9 potential

No governance = economic parameters must be self-regulating

Access Control

82+17.4 potential

Immutable contracts (no admin keys, no upgradability)

Adversarial Risk Signals

Publicly verifiable security posture indicators.

Disclosure HistoryNot Assessed

Remediation VelocityNot Assessed

Bug Bounty ProgramNot Assessed

Audit CoverageNot Assessed

Incident HistoryNot Assessed

Deployed 2024-10-0110 dimensionsProvenance Ledger

methodology v2.1formula v1.1weights v1.1evidence sha256:sha256:a...

Score History & Verification

Score provenance tracking begins with the next reassessment.

Full provenance ledger

On-Chain Data

Protocol Slug: "liquity-bold"
Oracle: BRORegistry (Base)
Evidence: IPFS (pinned)
Staleness Threshold: 24 hours

Read Score

registry.getScore("liquity-bold")

Reduce exploitable risk

Continuous adversarial analysis, vulnerability detection, and verified reassessment.

View Plans Methodology

Embed this score

Live, updates automatically. Free for any site. Click-through links open the full report on BlackHart.

Public

Style

Theme

Format

Preview

Copy iframe code

<iframe
  src="https://blackhart.io/embed/oracle/liquity-bold?variant=card&theme=dark"
  title="BlackHart Risk Index: Liquity BOLD"
  width="340"
  height="290"
  frameborder="0"
  loading="lazy"
  style="border:0; max-width:100%;"
></iframe>

Believe this score contains a factual error? Submit evidence for review