BlackHartPublic score as of Nov 7, 7 days behind. Live subscribers see every move the moment it lands.
Go live for $29
Hyperlane
Score history
Model updateEvery Score Move
Live for subscribersOpen any move to see what changedMay 17down 1Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 16up 1Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 15down 18Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 6up 5Model updateMethodology update
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
Dimensions
12 dimensions, 11 apply to Hyperlane. Open one to see how it is scored.Access controlscore 78weight 16%
Admin keys, roles, permissions and the checks that guard them.
Economic soundnessscore 75weight 12%
How the economic design holds up under flash loans, MEV, liquidation cascades and bad incentives.
Oracle integrityscore 72weight 12%
How prices reach the protocol, and how hard they are to manipulate or let go stale.
Maturityscore 58weight 11%
Time in production, value secured over time, audits, bounties and incident history.
- Live since
- Aug 1, 2022 (51 months)
- TVL
- N/A (infra)
- Audits
- Spearbit, Jun 2023
- Trail of Bits, Jan 2023
- Bug bounty
- Immunefi, up to $2,500,000
Adversarial resiliencescore 71weight 10%
How the code holds up under independent adversarial research.
Compositional riskscore 62weight 9%
External dependencies and the surface where contracts and integrations interact.
Governancescore 55weight 9%
Admin key concentration, timelocks and how upgrades happen.
Cross-chain messagingscore 65weight 9%
Bridge trust model, sequencer risk, fraud proofs and replay risk.
Operational securityscore 64weight 9%
Incident response, deployment hygiene, key management and monitoring.
- GitHub scan
- hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo on May 20
- Branch protection
- No
- Required reviews
- 0
- Signing ratio
- 100%
- Commits in 90 days
- 50
- PR review ratio
- 93%
- Has CI
- Yes
- CI success rate
- 60%
- Security policy
- No
- Deployment hygiene
- 77 of 100
- Development practices
- 54 of 100
- Emergency history
- 75 of 100
- Incident response
- 65 of 100
- Key management
- 70 of 100
- Monitoring
- 40 of 100
Cascade exposurescore 100weight 5%
Failures upstream that could spread into the protocol, and the damage if it fails.
Supply chainscore 78weight 4%
Compiler versions, libraries, build reproducibility and proxy patterns.
- Dependabot
- Yes