BlackHartPublic score as of Nov 7, 7 days behind. Live subscribers see every move the moment it lands.
Go live for $29
Ether.fi
Score history
Model updateEvery Score Move
Live for subscribersOpen any move to see what changedMay 15up 15Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 6down 29Model updateMethodology update
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
Dimensions
12 dimensions, 8 apply to Ether.fi. Open one to see how it is scored.Access controlscore 62weight 23%
Admin keys, roles, permissions and the checks that guard them.
Compositional riskscore 58weight 17%
External dependencies and the surface where contracts and integrations interact.
Adversarial resiliencescore 78weight 17%
How the code holds up under independent adversarial research.
Economic soundnessscore 75weight 12%
How the economic design holds up under flash loans, MEV, liquidation cascades and bad incentives.
Oracle integrityscore 72weight 12%
How prices reach the protocol, and how hard they are to manipulate or let go stale.
Governancescore 48weight 12%
Admin key concentration, timelocks and how upgrades happen.
Operational securityscore 65weight 12%
Incident response, deployment hygiene, key management and monitoring.
- GitHub scan
- etherfi-protocol/smart-contracts on May 20
- Branch protection
- No
- Required reviews
- 0
- Signing ratio
- 98%
- Commits in 90 days
- 32
- PR review ratio
- 87%
- Has CI
- Yes
- CI success rate
- 60%
- Security policy
- No
- Deployment hygiene
- 77 of 100
- Development practices
- 43 of 100
- Emergency history
- 75 of 100
- Incident response
- 65 of 100
- Key management
- 70 of 100
- Monitoring
- 70 of 100
Cascade exposurescore 100weight 12%
Failures upstream that could spread into the protocol, and the damage if it fails.