BlackHartPublic score as of Nov 7, 7 days behind. Live subscribers see every move the moment it lands.
Go live for $29
Drift Protocol
Score history
Model updateExploitEvery Score Move
Live for subscribersOpen any move to see what changedMay 20up 1Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 15up 6Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 15down 1Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 13down 36Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
May 6up 15Model updateDimensions rescored
BlackHart's method or evidence changed and the score was recalculated. No new release drove this move.
Dimensions
12 dimensions, 10 apply to Drift Protocol. Open one to see how it is scored.Access controlscore 60weight 18%
Admin keys, roles, permissions and the checks that guard them.
Economic soundnessscore 77weight 13%
How the economic design holds up under flash loans, MEV, liquidation cascades and bad incentives.
Oracle integrityscore 95weight 13%
How prices reach the protocol, and how hard they are to manipulate or let go stale.
Maturityscore 60weight 12%
Time in production, value secured over time, audits, bounties and incident history.
- Live since
- Nov 1, 2021 (60 months)
- TVL
- $500M+
- Audits
- Neodyme, Mar 2023
- OtterSec, Aug 2022
- Bug bounty
- Immunefi, up to $500,000
Governancescore 82weight 10%
Admin key concentration, timelocks and how upgrades happen.
Adversarial resiliencescore 50weight 10%
How the code holds up under independent adversarial research.
Operational securityscore 63weight 10%
Incident response, deployment hygiene, key management and monitoring.
- GitHub scan
- drift-labs/protocol-v2 on May 20
- Branch protection
- No
- Required reviews
- 0
- Signing ratio
- 52%
- Commits in 90 days
- 50
- PR review ratio
- 40%
- Has CI
- Yes
- CI success rate
- 20%
- Security policy
- Yes
- Deployment hygiene
- 69 of 100
- Development practices
- 34 of 100
- Emergency history
- 75 of 100
- Incident response
- 65 of 100
- Key management
- 70 of 100
- Monitoring
- 85 of 100
Compositional riskscore 97weight 5%
External dependencies and the surface where contracts and integrations interact.
Cascade exposurescore 95weight 5%
Failures upstream that could spread into the protocol, and the damage if it fails.
Supply chainscore 75weight 4%
Compiler versions, libraries, build reproducibility and proxy patterns.
- Dependabot
- No